Chapter 6
Conducting Textual and
Content Analyses
Outline |
Concepts |
I. Analysis of Message |
nomothetic research: studies designed to
find general laws that apply to many instances idiographic research: studies designed to develop a full understanding of a particular event or individual |
| A. What are Data in Textual and Content Analysis? B. When Do We Complete Textual Criticism and Content Analysis? --problem questions inviting qualitative/critical methods: characteristics of the message that contributed to its level of effectiveness; reasons for the impact of the message; whether the message measures up to standards of excellence --problem questions inviting content analysis, inter- actional and rela- tional dominance analysis: comparisons of messages, message flow or dominance from different sources; comparisons of message content with real life; the image of specific groups of people in society; changing uses of messages by different people or groups |
text: the actual messages or words of a communicator |
| II. Qualitative Analysis: Critical Studies of Texts --steps of criticism: (1) standards of excellence are presented; (2) data are described and applied against standards; (3) the degree to which the data meet or fall short of the standards is described |
rhetorical criticism: the use of standards
of excellence to interpret and evaluate communication --rhetoric: the study of the available means of persuasion criticism: standards of excellence are stated for application; to the extent that a message meets the standards, it is evaluated positively impressionistic criticism: statements of opinion (or personal impression) made by reviewers --determining authorship: reliance on external reports and comparisons of messages with other communication --determining textual authenticity: if the original work exists, comparisons can be made with it; if recordings of the event exist, comparisons can be made with them; comparisons of all texts (using "conjectural emendation" in which scholars explain which interpretation is most reasonable and thus should be accepted |
| A. Neo-Aristotelian Criticism --limitation: the method may be difficult to apply to messages relying chiefly on extralogical strategies |
neo-Aristotelian criticism: criticism making a new use
of Aristotelian standards canons: invention: the types and sources of ideas --ethos: (ethical appeals) the speaker's credibility --pathos: (pathetic appeals) the use of emotional or motivational appeals --logos: logical appeals, including the evidence and reasoning arrangement: organization of ideas style: the choice and use of words delivery: the nonverbal cues used by communicators when presenting messages memory: the speaker's ability to recall passages and examples for utterance (a canon not typically covered in modern criticism) |
| B. Burke's Dramatistic Criticism Method --limitation: messages are judged largely based on their effects; may be difficult to replicate |
identification: the uniting of people by use of shared
ideas, images, and attitudes dramatistic pentad: act: the symbolic action (the speech, for instance) that actually is exchanged scene: the setting in which the act takes place agent: the communicator who performs the act agency: the symbolic and linguistic strategies used to secure identification purpose: the intention of the communicator |
| C. The Never Ending Development of Methods --comparisons with religious models --creative analogies
|
narrative paradigm: analysis of messages
by looking at them as stories probability: stories that appear to be likely narrative fidelity: the consistency of new accounts with other stories people have heard mythic perspective: criticism by examination of the underlying stories to which speakers appeal (myth: a story about a particular incident which is put forward as containing or suggesting some general truth) fantasy theme analysis: a method of analyzing collections of communication to determine underlying world views that people hold, judging by the messages that they use fantasy: images or rhetorical visions of the way the world is organized |
| III. Quantitative Analysis: Content Analysis, Interaction and Relational Analyses A. Content Analysis 1. Uses of Content Analysis: a. character- ize com- munication b. study in traditional and non- traditional settings 2. How to Do Content Analysis steps: a. define and limit the communi- cation population to be studied b. select coding units and classification systems for study --requirements: exhaustive classifications; mutually exclusive categories; use of coding rules for placing objects in categories c. sample messages |
content analysis: a systematic method to analyze the content and treatment of communications |
|
--methods for sampling: |
random: every instance in the population has an equal
chance of being selected; stratification: strata are identified and a random sample within each stratum is proportionately selected; interval: instances of communication at specific units in time; cluster: groups of messages appear in a cluster that already exists multistage: instances selected sequentially |
|
d. code message content --reliability must be shown; --training of coders must be completed e. analyze data statistically f. interpret results 3. Limitations of the Approach: cannot draw cause-effect conclusions; difficult to find representative samples; cannot generalize to other categories of content analysis |
|
| --conversational and discourse analysis |
conversational and discourse analysis: forms
non-numerical methods of analyzing the functions performed in conversations --conversational analysis: a method that identifies turns taken by people during exchanges; --utterance: the message a person actually exchanges in a conversation --discourse analysis: a method that considers naturally occurring messages to examine sequential and hierarchical organization, system, and structure using methods that are fairly standard in phonology and linguistics |
| B. Interaction and Relational Analyses |
interaction and relational analyses: forms of content analysis designed to describe the continuing oral communication between people; these methods apply categories to conversations and discussions to find out how people affect and control each other |
|
1. Interaction Analysis |
interaction analysis: a method focusing on ways of
tracking individual acts of communicators --interacts: one person's conversation and the reaction of another --double interacts: an interact followed by the first person's response to the other person's reaction |
|
2. Relational Control Analysis |
relational control analysis: a method that tracks message sequences to determine the relative patterns of position and control in the relationship |
|
3. Using Interaction and Relational Control Analysis a. decide on a coding system b. train coders c. gather samples d. code message content e. analyze and interpret message content 4. Limitations of the Approach --may not be useful to assess perceptions or interpreta- tions of individuals; cannot draw conclusions about cause and effect relationships |